Friday, December 20, 2013

Float.


For this picture i didn't really have an inspiration, like my partner just wanted to jump off of that. In my opinion, this is a nice picture. This one was pretty easy to capture the stop in the jump. Even if i did have any problems i could just set the shutter speed higher than what it was. I couldnt think of a better idea, so its simple but still a good picture.

My inspiration for this one was for her to look like she's about to fly up into the sky. I faced no technical difficulties because she was standing on a chair and i used photoshop to make it seem like she was floating. I think it was pretty creative because it looks like shes about to fly up.


My inspiration for this picture was was for it to seem like ryan was powerful enough to lift her up from the ground, it looks pretty cool. Some of the pictures came out blurry so i had to retake it like 5 times, but it finally came out good. This idea came into my head as soon as we started the project so then we decided to do it, but people were also busy taking pictures. Many people didnt want to be in the picture because they had to finish their own work.





Monday, December 9, 2013

Creative Controls


 Part 1: 
  1. Which Aperture makes a wider hole in the lens for light to come through? F/3.5 
  2. Which Aperture lets more light into the camera to hit the image sensor? F/5.6
  3. Which Aperture keeps more of the foreground and background in focus? F/11.
  4. Which Shutter Speed is faster?  1/200 second.
  5. Which Shutter Speed keeps the door in the camera open for more time? 1/30 second
  6. Which Shutter Speed is best for stopping action? 1/200 second.   
Part 2:
To me, all these three pictures look pretty much the same. I dont see any differences between them. 

Since the shutter speed of 1/10 second lets more light in, the first one was very bright. the 1/60 second was better looking and then the last one at 1/500 is the best looking out of all.



when she was moving the 1/10 second was too slow to catch the motion clearly. Using the 1/60 second was much better but still didnt get the motion to stop in the picture completely. Finally the 1/500 second surely caught the motion, it even looks like she wasnt moving at all.



The first one was taken at 1/10 second, it didnt catch the motion clearly or ad good lighting because it let too much light into the picture. The second one was taken at 1/60 second, it was better looking but the lighting was still to bright there. Third picture was taken at 1/500 and it caught the motion to stop, so its nice and clear, also the lighting is now good because its not too bright nor too dark.


 Part 3:

 1) To me depth of field means what part of the picture is not blurry and focused.
2) you'd use a wide aperature when you want to make the background of the picture blurry, but you would have to back away from the object and zoom in for that to happen.
3) when my partner and i took panning pictures, the 1/10 second let too much light in and didnt stop the motion. But when the shutter speed was 1/500 second the picture's lighting was nice and clear and the motion was stopped.